Sunday, 8 July 2018

The Story of our Family - Generation Five: Mary, Catherine, Thomas & Margaret

The generations
One:    Patrick? Donoghue (b.c.1745) & an unknown wife – gggggrandparents
Two:    James Donoghue (b.c.1775) & Julia Boyle – ggggrandparents
Three:  Thomas Donoghue (1806 - 63) & Ellen Connor (1808 – 89) - gggrandparents
Four:    Thomas O’Donoghue (1844 - 1920) & Mary Sullivan (1845 - 80) - ggrandparents
Five:    Mary O’Donoghue (27 July 1866 – 1 August 1866
            Catherine O’Donoghue (1867 – 1954)
            Thomas William O’Donoghue (1869 - 71)
            Margaret O’Donoghue (1872 – c.1942)
            James O’Donoghue (b.1874) and Ada Agnes Tait (b.1879) - grandparents
            Mary Ann O’Donoghue (b.1877) and George William Phillips (b.1879)
            Gwendoline Anastasia Celina O’Donoghue (b.1880)

I gave some basic details of the children of Thomas and Mary Sullivan’s when I told their story.  I will endeavour to tell you more about them in this and later blogs.
When I started out on the trail of our family I was confused by the names of Thomas and Mary’s children.  Traditional Irish naming practice went like this
First son after paternal grandfather – so Thomas √
First daughter after paternal grandmother – so Ellen, but actually Mary
Second son after maternal grandfather – so John, but James was oldest paternal uncle
Second daughter after maternal grandmother – so Margaret, but Catherine
Third son after father – No third son
Third daughter after mother – so Mary, but Margaret after her maternal grnadmother
Fourth son after oldest paternal uncle – No fourth son
Fourth daughter after oldest maternal aunt – I only know of brothers for Mary Sullivan their mother
You can see that there is very little concordance with the tradition.  Ellen and John don’t even get a look in.  What does this tell us?
Thomas had only been in London from c.1851, but Mary’s Sullivan family had been there rather longer.  While Thomas might have wanted to follow tradition, Mary wasn’t interested, she was a London-born girl.  While we can find a family connection for all the names, apart from Gwendoline, there is no pattern.  The full tradition rarely lasted more than one generation out of Ireland and was fading even in Ireland in the second half of the 19th century.
Mary (27 July 1866 – 1 August 1866)
One can’t but feel for Thomas and Mary, born on the 27th July, their first child died five days later on the 1st August of convulsions.  These must have been some sort of seizure brought on by fever.  Her grandfather had died in 1863 of typhoid, but cholera was also rampant in 1866 so it could have been either of them that did for little Mary.  The infant mortality rate in England and Wales in the 1870s was c.15%, so one imagines that for London it would have been very much higher in the light of the growth and density of population.
Mother, Mary, describes herself as Mary Ann and the informant for both birth and death was her brother, James, who was unable to sign his name.
At this time her parents were living in 8 Croucher Place, Railway Street, Bromley, Poplar.  Railway Street ran north to south along the east side of the London Railway line, which terminated in the Bass Pale Ale Stores warehouse just the north-east of the West India Docks.

Catherine (1867 – 1954) – aka Aunt Kate
Compared to poor Mary, Catherine lived until she was 85.  She was born on 17 June at 13 Avenue, Bromley.  This road ran along the east side of Campbell Road which goes up to the Bow Road.  Booth in his 1889 Poverty Maps describes these streets as ‘Mixed, some comfortable, some poor’.
The family would have been right under the North London Railway which connected North London with the East and West India Docks; it must have been very noisy and dirty from the steam trains.  Bow Station (above) was probably Thomas’s route to work.  Did he buy a ticket like this?
By 1871 the family had moved down to Charles Street nearer the East India Dock Road, so one presumes that Catherine would have gone to the Wade Street School and worshipped at St Mary and St Joseph’s in Canton Street.
Her mother died in 1880, Catherine was 13 and became the family’s mother figure and Thomas’s housekeeper.  Education was compulsory for children under 13 in 1870 so one imagines that that was it for Catherine.  I suspect she rather regretted ending her education because I have been given the impression that she was a rather shy, quiet and studious person, certainly very religious.  By 1891 the youngest child at home, Mary Ann, was 14 so she could go out to work.  In the 1901 census she described her occupation as ‘looks after home’. She continued to live, unmarried, with her father until his death in 1920.
I was told that Catherine worked as a nanny for a shipping family named Tye who lived in the East India Dock Road.  She said that they were a very nice family and that “it was not like going out into the world to work”.  This was early in her working life I imagine. 
  It’s the one on the left in this old picture.  The building was on the corner of Chrisp Street and just round  from where Catherine lived.  They had one child, John, of 18, hardly material for a nanny!  They did, however, employ a servant.
In the 1901 census a Patrick James and Mary Ann Tye were living at 176 East India Dock.Road.

He is described as an iron ship cementer (fills in all the cracks) and as his wife is described as an employer in 1911 they must have been running a business.
In 1891 the Tyes were living in Wells Street just off Cotton Street
By 1911 Patrick had died and Mary Ann was living with her niece, Mary Ann Deeble, who was 11, plus a servant.  She was running the company.
In 1911 Catherine was a washer woman working from home so she was probably employed to look after son, John, and possibly niece, Mary Ann, any time between 1891 and before 1911.
She is said to have been in service in the West End and in particular the Old Brompton Road.  I cannot add anything to that, but sometime after the 1914-18 war her employer was a Nora Barton Wilson, whose daughters went to a Ursuline Convent.
A Ursuline school was founded in 1892 in Wimbledon.  This is the original building.  It is the only one in the west London area so one imagines that this was it. 
In 1911 there was a Barton-Wilson (very few folk with that name) family living in Kingston upon Thames (right sort of area), but the lady of the house was a Jane Mary a widow of 61, with a son of 37.  I cannot find a Nora anywhere so that’s as far as I have got.
  She regaled the children with stories of Ireland.  Bernie, Len and Kate Hosford remembered them well. 
Aunt Kate was an inveterate storyteller.  She told the children that she had heard a banshee.  She used to say "If you hear the banshee trouble will follow".  One is supposed to hear such noises in the night when the last of a great family died in Ireland.  She heard it the night her grandmother died (in 1889) and the name she used was O'Connor, which of course was the case.

The banshee was most likely to be seen at midnight, dusk or dawn. In other words when light was poor. She might appear on strangely formed rocks or hills, by rivers and lakes or by the house where the person was dying. The most common manifestation was as a lady washing or combing her long hair. There were different banshee personalities for individual areas and they were often associated with the fairy queens. Individual families had their own character and there were two for the O’Connors and one for the O’Donoghues.

She used to say that the family was from Ross Castle in Killarney.  When I first got to know Bernie, that’s what he said.  So Catherine was to blame for me wasting many years trying to find our lot in that area!
To recall, from around 1900 our family lived in Cotton Street and the Phillips family lived next door.  Catherine was a very good needlewoman, dressmaker and made the children’s clothes for both the O’Donoghue and Phillips' families.
She was a quiet, gentle person who both families went to when they wanted any little job attended to or needed to talk a problem over.  She was a vegetarian.
She never made outside friends or went out with anyone.  She went to the pictures only twice, once with Kate Phillip's mother and father and with my father, George.  She was very shy.
Maureen is the only one of us to have met her and remembers a very old lady who lived on the top floor of 60 Cotton Street and never went out.
In 1939, she went to live with Mary Phillips in Dagenham, where her sister Mary Ann (who married Mary’s father) was already living.  She was looked after variously by Mary, Lottie and Kate Phillips until she died in 1954 at Mary’s house at 41 Winifred Road, Dagenham.  Mary’s husband Arthur Williams was the informant.

Thomas William O’Donoghue (1869 – 71) 
Born on 21 November 1869 at 13 Market Street, two years later he was dead from compression of the brain.
This is pressure inside the skull that pushes on the brain and cerebrospinal fluid.  This is most commonly the result of a head injury that causes bleeding or swelling in the brain, but also can be due to a tumour, abscess, or increase in cerebrospinal fluid.
Whatever caused it, it was another awful blow to the family.  Thomas and Mary must have been distraught.
Margaret (1872 – c.1942) – aka Madge
She was born on 3 July 1872 at 83 Augusta Street and named after her maternal grandmother.  But to make sense of her life has proved very difficult.  One thing is clear, the two sisters, Catherine and Margaret, were entirely different personalities.
She vanishes from the records between 1882 and 1901, but reappears in the 1911 census living with her father at 21 Cotton Street, age 38, single with no children and with an occupation of servant.  There is a column on the census form that asks whether you were an Employer, Worker or Own Account.  Margaret is described as Own Account and I haven’t seen that designation in the family.  Might this suggest a somewhat independent lady? 
My main family sources have been Kate Hosford (née Phillips), Bernie and Len.  With family stories memory plays tricks but this is her story as best remembered.
She was a nurse at The London Hospital (today the Royal London Hospital is on the Whitechapel Road) or a London hospital.  She was also in show business on the chorus line.  She looked after a Jewish boy (possibly in the West End) and his parents gave her their store.
She used to speak of a girl named Golda whose brother she was very fond of and who gave her a lovely gold watch.  Did the brother become her husband?
I have been told that she was married and possibly had two children, one of whom was killed, which broke their hearts.  Her husband was a rich Jew possibly named Hyman, Ivan or Herschel.  They lived in Aldgate and the family had a shop or business there.
Margaret became a drinker and her husband came to see Thomas, her father, who died in 1920, and was heartbroken but could take no more.  He was a thorough gentleman apparently.
This history implies that the marriage must have taken place after 1911 and before 1920.
She had beautiful clothes. She always wore a black veil over her face when going out.  Her skin was lovely and she always used the same perfume.   Sadly no one seems to have had a photo of her.
She used to visit Aunt Kate on Saturdays.  She was the only one Margaret would take notice of when she had been drinking.
The drinking caused her to lose everything and she finished on the street.  James, her brother, turned her away which he always regretted.
In her later years she lived in Whitechapel, but was believed to have been in Poplar in 1941-2 and may have been killed in the bombing.
I have not been able to confirm any of this sad story. After 1911 I cannot find her in the records.  She has been the most elusive of our ancestors.  I will continue to look.
Sources & acknowledgements

Sunday, 3 September 2017

What happened to our family from 1851? Generation Four: Ellen Donoghue & Mary Ann O'Donoghue & William Rochester

The generations
One:    Patrick? Donoghue (b.c.1745) & an unknown wife – gggggrandparents
Two:    James Donoghue (b.c.1775) & Julia Boyle – ggggrandparents
Three:  Thomas Donoghue (b.1806) & Ellen Connor - gggrandparents
Four:    Julia Donoghue (b.1834) & John Carrington (b.1830)
            James Donoghue (b.1836)
            Catherine Donoghue (b.1839) & James Madden (b.1848?)
            John Donoghue (b.1841)
            Thomas O’Donoghue (b.1844) & Mary Sullivan (b.1845) ggrandparents
            Ellen Donoghue (b.1847)
            Mary Ann O’Donoghue (b.1852) & William Rochester (b.c.1852)          
Ellen Donoghue
In Irish Ellen is Eibhlín (Evleen), it is a nice sound.  The ending ín is the diminutive form, for little people.  How appropriate for this child who died so young.  She was clearly named after her mother.
Ellen, Thomas and Ellen’s third daughter, was born in Ballyduff in 1847.  She was baptised on 25 April in the village church.  It is possible that she died very soon after her birth because the winter of 1846-7 was one of the worst in memory and Ireland was in the grip of a terrible famine.  She did not go to London with her parents; she disappeared from the records.  Deaths were not dealt with as diligently as births and marriages in the parish registers, particularly in those years when thousands and thousands of people were dying.  Ellen was a tiny mite and it is probable that Thomas and Ellen, her mother, had struggled to feed their family and keep them warm under the awful conditions.  They were relatively well off as valued artisans and had an honourable landlord, so imagine what it was like for those less protected. 
Perhaps Ellen lasted longer than I just said and her death may have been the final straw for Thomas and Ellen, causing them to leave their home for England in 1850-1.  We will just never know.
In the 19th century all classes were vulnerable to outbreaks of whooping-cough, cholera, typhus, dysentery, influenza, smallpox, measles and many other illnesses which were later prevented by vaccination.  Life expectancy was very low compared to today.  I have read that in the early 1800s a male’s average life span was 38 years.  Our next generation, Thomas and Mary, lost three of their seven children, Mary, Thomas and Gwendoline, within two years of their births, the girls within a few months.
‘Black’ 1847
I have written about the famine years, 1845-49, before but 1847 was so central that it is worth repeating some of the history.
The potato crop completely failed in 1845 & 1846.  In ‘Black’ 1847 as it is known, there was a potato crop, but only twenty five percent of normal; however there was a good grain crop.  A laissez-faire trade policy was being followed by the Westminster government. This  allowed the local good quality grain crop to be exported by absentee landowners rather than it being used to feed the people, while the government was importing American maize, but leaving it to the local merchants as to how it was distributed.  Only in west Cork, Kerry and Donegal did direct intervention take place.  The result was that there just was not enough accessible food in Ireland and the people were weakened by the two prior years’ shortages.
The iconic picture on the left is from the Illustrated London News in 1847.  They sent illustrators to Ireland and began publishing pictures of famine victims, raising awareness of the unfolding catastrophe in the rest of Britain.
The government's efforts were concentrated primarily on creating employment and paying people so that they could buy their own food.  But the cost had to be met through local rates.  The pay was low and not nearly enough to support a family.  However, three quarters of a million people had signed up to the work schemes (such as building roads) by March of 1847.  The workhouses, set up in the previous decade for those who could no longer afford to support themselves, were feared.  But by the end of 1846 they were full.
Private charity was responsible for keeping hundreds of thousands of people alive in the winter of 1846 to 1847.  Catholic priests organised food.  Funds were raised in Britain and America to buy and ship maize and to buy food boilers (for soup kitchens).  Clothes were also brought in as many of the local people had pawned their winter clothes to buy food. 
In the summer of 1847 the government scrapped the relief programmes and began to organise full-scale food distribution.  By the end of the year imports of grain finally exceeded exports.
So Ellen was born into the worst year of the famine and was almost certainly a casualty.
Mary Ann O’Donoghue & William Rochester
Mary Ann is the first O’Donoghue of our direct family line to have been born in England.  She was born on 20 March 1852 in Poplar and baptised on 16 May at St Mary & St Joseph’s, the family church.  She would have been educated at the Wade Street School.  In 1861 she was with her mother in Mary Street and in 1863 was godmother to her cousin Catherine Carrington at the age of 11.  Today the minimum age in the Catholic Church for godparenting is 16; I have been unable to ascertain if this was different in the 19th century.  This is so young that it makes me wonder if there was another family member called Mary Ann, whom I have not yet identified.
By 1881 Mary Ann was a domestic servant living with her elder sister Julia in Market Street.
On 20 July 1882 she married William Thomas Rochester in Trinity Independent Chapel, Poplar.  Built in 1841, this was of the Congregational or Methodist denomination.  It was on the corner of East India Dock Road and Augusta Street and is described as very architecturally significant with its large elegant frontage.
Our family was staunch Roman Catholic in those days and yet Julia and Mary Ann were married outside of that faith: Julia in an Anglican church and Mary Ann in a Methodist one.  Siblings Catherine and Thomas were both married in the Catholic St Mary & St Josephs.  This was the start of the family’s withdrawal from the Catholic faith which continued for some in the next generation as my grandmother was a protestant.
Allow me a theory.  Normally the woman would choose the church.  I suspect Julia was diverted by her husband John, who was a Protestant, and that Mary Ann, being very close to her 18 years older sister, chose an alternative because of her.  Alternatively the Rochesters were Methodists.  Perhaps the future husbands’ families held sway on these choices.
At the time of the marriage William Rochester was 30 years-old and Mary Ann 29 – quite late by the standards of the day.  His occupation is described as commercial traveller and he was living in Brockley, Kent.  His father was a Richard, an accountant.  What this occupation really meant we can only surmise, but the accounting profession was formalising its structure around this time; it could mean anything from a bookkeeper/clerk to a forensic accountant.
The Rochesters
are a bit of a mystery.  I looked for William, born in 1852, in the 1881 census.  There is one boarding in 66 High Street, Lambeth, born in 1854, whose occupation is shown as general labourer.   But I don’t think you could go from a general labourer to commercial traveller in one year.  I looked for Richard, his father, back over the decades and there are certainly no accountants.  I am very suspicious that there is a lot of dodgy data here and I could find no records that really gelled.  On their marriage certificate the residential addresses were transposed which does not fill one with confidence.  So I am going to move on and perhaps come back to the Rochesters at a later date…I get bored easily!
The children
In 1883, William Charles Herman Rochester was born.  Why Herman?  This is a German name.  Is there a clue in there somewhere? 
Mary Ann, now calling herself Marian or Marion, was living at 20 Rowlett Street, Bromley, Poplar.  William, the father, has become a mariner.  Rowlett Street was east from Chrisp Street at the end of Grundy Street.
Bernard Francis Rochester was born in 1886 in 155 Brunswick Road, Bromley.
Marie Gertrude Rochester was born in 1888 at 37 Hind Street, Poplar with Mary Ann’s sister, Catherine, present at the birth and William is shown as a merchant seaman.
All these streets were in close proximity to the rest of the family
One imagines that the three sisters, Mary Ann, Julia (18 years her senior) and Catherine (13 years older) were very close.  Mary Ann was living with Julia when she got married in 1882 and Catherine was present at the birth of her third child
By 1891 the family had moved to 88 Caister Park Road, Plaistow,West Ham, which they shared with another family.  William, the father, was not at home, at sea no doubt.  However by 1901 he was dead as Marian is described as a widow living at 21 Moreton Road, West Ham.
Caister Park Road is just off West Ham Park, a very historic place, as are most of London’s parks. 
In 1873, a petition of inhabitants of West Ham and Stratford was received by the City of London (the City) asking for assistance in the purchase of the Park for preservation as an open space.  The City agreed to grant the sum of £10,000 for the purpose.  Mr. John Gurney, a grandson of Mr. Samuel Gurney, who had inherited the estate in 1812, was at that time the owner of the Ham House Estate, which was 77 acres in extent and valued at £25,000.  He and other members of his family jointly contributed £10,000, the City duly paid £10,000 and the remaining £5,000 of purchase money was prescribed locally.  West Ham Park was officially opened on 20 July 1874.  The City undertook to maintain the Park forever at its own expense.  The public park was laid out by 1887, incorporating features from the earlier park including the pleasure gardens, mature trees, and the carriage drive.  The picture to left is The Terrace in 1904.
I have not managed to find Mary Ann in the 1911 census.  Perhaps she married again but I have not found a marriage that fits or a death in the name of Mary Ann Rochester.
William Charles Herman Rochester b.1883
In 1891 he was living with his mother in West Ham.  By 1901 his father had died and he was shown as head of the household, at age 18, with the occupation of incandescent (light bulb) fitter. 
At some point before 1911 he became a soldier in the Royal Marine Light Infantry.  The Light Infantry were merged with the Royal Marine Artillery in 1923.  Left is the cap badge at that time.
By the 1911 census he had risen to the rank of corporal and was in the Essex Regiment stationed in Quetta, Baluchistan in India.  Right is the cap badge of this regiment
This is the territory that we learnt about at school as the North West Frontier (of Khyber Pass fame).  William was there between the Second Afghan War which ended in 1880, in which red-coated British soldiers were perpetually ambushed by local tribesmen, and the Third which started in 1919.  Nothing much has changed in terms of conflict!  Quetta is now in Pakistan, however.
In 1908 William may have taken part in two expeditions against the Zakha Zel and Mohmand, two great Pashtun tribal groups. 
He appears to have left the army sometime between 1911 and 1915, when he re-enlisted in the 1st Battalion of the Essex Regiment as a sergeant. 
The 1st Battalion took part in the Gallipoli Campaign disembarking on 25 April at Cape Helles.  This picture shows the landing.  They were engaged in heavy fighting.  William was wounded on the 2 June.
This campaign was a complete failure and the battalion was evacuated on 8 January 1916, moving to Egypt.  On the 16 March they sailed from Alexandria to France.
The 1st Battalion took part in the first day of the Battle of the Somme on 1 July 1916.  The  battalion took up position in the British trenches at 3:30 am.  
At 8:40 am, the battalion received orders to advance and clear the German first-line trenches.   It was delayed by heavy enemy fire and congestion in the communication trenches.  The Newfoundland Regiment advancing to the left of the Essex battalion was almost entirely wiped out as it advanced towards the German lines.  At 10:50 am, the Essex companies were in position and received orders to go ‘over the top’.  They came under heavy artillery and machine gun fire almost as soon as they appeared over the parapet, causing heavy losses.  The attack became bogged down in no man's land.  The battalion received orders from 88th Brigade headquarters to recommence the attack at 12:30 pm, but at 12:20 pm the battalion commander advised brigade HQ that ‘owing to casualties and disorganisation’, it was impossible to do so.  The survivors of the battalion received orders to hold their position along the line of 'Mary Redan' – 'New Trench' – 'Regent Street'.
On that first day alone the British Army lost 57,470 casualties, of whom 19,240 men were killed.  William saw out 1916 but was wounded again on 23 April 1917. 
He received the 1914-5 Star, Victory and British medals and appears to have survived the war or, at least, I have not found a record of his death.    
Bernard Francis Rochester b.1886
Bernard also joined the army in the 2nd Battalion Essex Regiment in 1904.  He was almost immediately shipped to Malta.  In that year 55% of the regiment contracted a ‘simple continued fever’.  
On 4 February 1905 Bernard died of what was then called Malta Fever or brucellosis.  It does not actually name this fever but it seems a reasonable assumption.  Here is a record of his death.
Also known as undulant fever, Gibraltar fever, Bang's disease, or Mediterranean fever, brucellosis is most likely to occur among those individuals who regularly work with livestock. The disease originated in domestic livestock, on Malta in particular, goats. In humans, brucellosis continues to be spread via unpasteurized milk obtained from infected cows or through contact with the discharges of cattle and goats.  In areas of the world where milk is not pasteurized, for example in Latin America and the Mediterranean, the disease is still contracted by ingesting unpasteurized dairy products.
Apparently, on Malta, the local farmers used to walk their goats from customer to customer, milking them at each place.
The effect of the disease on the British army in Malta was such that up to the middle of 1906, the garrison of Malta lost annually the services of some 650 soldiers and sailors for a period of 120 days each, making a total of some 80,000 days of illness.  Soldiers suffering from the disease had an average stay in hospital of nearly 90 days within a range of 15 days to two years and although the mortality rate amongst the military was low at around 2%, the mortality rate for civilians on Malta was much higher.
Bernard was clearly very unlucky.  Poor Mary Ann.
Marie Gertrude Rochester b.1888
Marie was with her mother and brother in 1901 but by 1911, like her mother, I can find no trace of her, until her death on 26 October 1918 at 135 King’s Road, Brighton.  By then she was known as Elsie Marie.  She was working as a chambermaid in a hotel, perhaps one of the ones in this picture.  Mary Ann was present at her daughter’s death.  She died from influenza which brought on pneumonia.
The ‘Spanish Flu’ pandemic of 1918 was one of the greatest medical disasters of the 20th century. This was a global pandemic, an airborne virus which affected every continent.
It was nicknamed ‘Spanish flu’ as the first reported cases were in Spain. As this was during World War One, newspapers were censored (Germany, the United States, Britain and France all had media blackouts on news that might lower morale) so although there were influenza (flu) cases elsewhere, it was the Spanish cases that hit the headlines. One of the first casualties was the King of Spain.
Although not caused by World War I, it is thought that in the UK, the virus was spread by soldiers returning home from the trenches in northern France. Soldiers were becoming ill with what was known as ‘la grippe’, the symptoms of which were sore throats, headaches and a loss of appetite. Although highly infectious in the cramped, primitive conditions of the trenches, recovery was usually swift and doctors at first called it ‘three-day fever’.
The outbreak hit the UK in a series of waves, with its peak at the end of WW1. Returning from Northern France at the end of the war, the troops travelled home by train. As they arrived at the railway stations, so the flu spread from the railway stations to the centre of the cities, then to the suburbs and out into the countryside. Not restricted to class, anyone could catch it.
Young adults between 20 and 30 years old were particularly affected and the disease struck and progressed quickly in these cases. Marie was 30.  Onset was devastatingly quick. Those fine and healthy at breakfast could be dead by tea-time. Within hours of feeling the first symptoms of fatigue, fever and headache, some victims would rapidly develop pneumonia and start turning blue, signalling a shortage of oxygen. They would then struggle for air until they suffocated to death.
Hospitals were overwhelmed and even medical students were drafted in to help.  Doctors and nurses worked to breaking point, although there was little they could do as there were no treatments for the flu and no antibiotics to treat the pneumonia.
During the pandemic of 1918/19, over 50 million people died worldwide and a quarter of the British population were affected. The death toll was 228,000 in Britain alone.
At the time of Marie’s death, Mary Ann was living in 352 High Road, Brondesbury in North-West London.  I think today it is known as the Kilburn High Road.  What took her there, I wonder…
So many unanswered questions
This project has been a bit frustrating.  I would like to know more about William Thomas Rochester’s family, but have hit blockages.
And Mary Ann, by 1918 she had lost two of her three children.  Did she re-marry?  When did she die?  What happened to her first child, William Charles, after WW1?
I have, so far, been unable to find answers to these questions.  Challenges for another time
Sources and acknowledgements:

Thursday, 1 June 2017

What happened to our family from 1851? Generation Four: Thomas O'Donoghue & Mary Sullivan


The generations
One:    Patrick? Donoghue (b.c.1745) & an unknown wife – gggggrandparents
Two:    James Donoghue (b.c.1775) & Julia Boyle – ggggrandparents
Three:  Thomas Donoghue (b.1806) & Ellen Connor - gggrandparents
Four:    Julia Donoghue (b.1834) & John Carrington (b.1830)
             James Donoghue (b.1836)
             Catherine Donoghue (b.1839) & James Madden (b.1848?)
             John Donoghue (b.1841)
             Thomas O’Donoghue (b.1844) & Mary Sullivan (b.1845) ggrandparents
             Ellen Donoghue (b.1847)
             Mary Ann Donoghue (b.1852) & William Rochester (b.c.1850)       

In Ballyduff

Thomas was born in 1844, so he was six when his parents left the village in 1850/1 with most of the children.  Thomas was too young to have had any substantive schooling in Ireland, but he would have spoken Irish.  His family would probably have spoken some English, in order to interact with their landlord.  As the son of a valued artisan he would have been better off than most, but being born just as the famine was starting, it would have been an awful first few years for a little lad.

Early life in Poplar

In an earlier blog I described how I found Thomas’s parents in Orchard Place, St Marylebone parish in 1851 in an awful area totally dominated by Irish including other Donoghues.  It is my theory that their children went to Dublin with Julia, their oldest child at 16, while Thomas and Ellen, the parents, sorted out arrangements in London.
Thomas would have received his education at Wade Street School.  This is what it looked like when Uncle Bernie took me to see it in the 1990s.

The map below shows where it was in 1894-6. 


Until 1908 it was known as the Wade Street School and from 1908 until 1983, SS Mary and Joseph's Roman Catholic School.  I imagine all of my Poplar ancestors would have been educated there.
There were lots of Irish in this area south of the East India Dock Road in the 1850s to 1880s and many must have had to learn English as a starter.  Both Uncles Bernie and Len heard a lot about Thomas, but were too young to have known him.  I was told he was literate and used to correct the children's pronunciation and spellings.  They both recalled some Irish being spoken in the home by the older folk.
In 1861 Thomas was living with his mother Ellen, brother John and sister Mary Ann in 28 Mary Street (later Rook Street) on the map above.  As I have described before this was a very rough area
‘By the late nineteenth century this area of small terraced houses had developed an unenviable reputation. The vicinity of Sophia Street and Rook (formerly Mary) Street was described as 'a regular Irish den … all the vices of the Irish rampant, murder, rows, riot etc… . and fat brawny brawling women shouting at one another.'
His occupation was shown as hammer man on the census.  Len told me that the hammer man was the man behind a riveter.  He thought that they were called a holder up man later.  The riveter knocked the rivet in from one side and the hammer man was on the other side.  He was more like a mate.
Thomas progressed to full boilermaker status in later years.
The trade of Boilermaker evolved from the industrial blacksmith and was known in the early 19th century as a 'boilersmith'.  The involvement of boilermakers in the shipbuilding and engineering industries came about because of the changeover from wood to iron as a construction material.   It was easier (and cheaper) to utilise the boilermaker's skills to construct the ship as they were already present in the shipyard constructing iron boilers for wooden steamships.  This utilisation of skills extended to virtually everything that was large and made of iron, or later, steel.  In the UK this near monopoly over the key skill of the industrial revolution led to them being termed 'the labour aristocracy' by historians.
Steam engines were used to power many machines, trains and ships in the 19th Century.  A boiler was an essential part of a steam engine as it was used to heat water to create steam.  Boilers were made of plates of metal or tubes that were cut, bent and shaped by the boilermakers.  Boilermakers also worked as general metal workers rolling, shearing, welding, riveting and making metal structures and machines.  They built steam trains, constructed metal bridges and built iron and steel ships.

As his father was a farrier/blacksmith we can see why Thomas, and later generations, became boilermakers.  It also suggests that Thomas’s father came to London specifically to work in the shipbuilding industry, rather than the London sewers and underground construction which was an earlier suggestion of mine.

Marriage to Mary Sullivan

On 15 December, 1865 Thomas married Mary Sullivan at St Mary & St Michael’s Roman Catholic Church in the Commercial Road, St George in the East.  Quite why they chose this church we will never know.  This was apparently one of the most famous Catholic parishes in the country
The marriage certificate is shown below 
Both signed their own names and his occupation was shown as caulker.  A caulker filled up cracks in ships, casks, windows or seams to make them watertight by using tar or oakum hemp fibre produced by taking old ropes apart.
They are both shown as living at 2 Lucas Street (Lukehurst Street according to the parish register), Mile End Old Town.  I can’t find that street under either name in maps or lists of the time but presumably they had to show that they were residents of the parish to be married in that church. 
The Sullivans and Mahoneys
John and Margaret were married in 1842 at the Catholic Church of St Mary & St Joseph in Canton Street, Poplar.
In 1851 the Sullivans and their children James (b.1843), Mary (b.1845), John (b.1851) were living at 4 Wades Place, Poplar (see the map above). 
John was a blacksmith, so it is not too long a shot to say that Thomas’s father and John were probably colleagues and that is how the families got to know each other. 
In 1861 John and Margaret had moved into nearby Cross Street.  James was still living with them.  I have not yet established what happened to them after that.
John’s father was James Sullivan and his mother, Mary.  Margaret’s parents were Jeremiah and Ellen, who were living in St Giles in the Fields, further west, in 1851.  This was a notorious ‘rookery’ or slum area heavily populated by Irish.
The Sullivan and Mahoney names are very common in Cork and Kerry but I have been unable so far to find any baptismal records for these folk.
Thomas and Mary’s family
Throughout their life together we sometimes find Thomas with the second name of Joseph and Mary is referred to as Mary Ann on one occasion and Mary Theresa on another.  Catholics take a second name at confirmation.
They had seven children, for whom I give a little bit of detail to be followed at a later stage with separate blogs.
  1. Mary was born 27 July 1866.  She died 14 days later of convulsions.  The informant at both birth and death was James Sullivan of 8 Croucher Place, Railway Street.  I suspect that he was her uncle because her brother would only have been 15 at the time. But where was Thomas?  Perhaps the birth came in a rush and he was at work.  At all future birth and deaths Thomas was present.
2. Catherine (see right) was born 17 June 1867 at 13 Avenue, Bromley She was the Aunt Kate, a quiet, gentle and very religious person, who lived on the top floor of 60 Cotton Street in later years.  Her nieces and nephews (and the neighbours’ children) turned to her when they had problems.

 3. Thomas William, born 21 November 1869, died two years later of compression of the brain which suggests a fall perhaps. He was born at 13 Market Street and died at 2 Charles Street.

   4.  Margaret, born 3 July 1872, at 83 Augusta Street.  She went on the stage, is said to have married a rich Jew and to have had a child, of which so far I have found no evidence.  Her life ended very sadly.  Hers  will be a difficult story to unravel.

   5.  James, my grandfather, was born 15
      November 1874 at 12 Cordelia Street.  He
      ran away to sea at a very young age, travelling
      to faraway places.   He followed his father as
      a boilermaker.  He married Ada Agnes Tait,
      a Protestant, in 1899    
6.  Mary Ann (see right), born 7 March 1877, at 54 Grundy Street. 
    She married George Phillips in 1903.  She was a milliner who made
    all the children’s hats.
7.  Gwendoline Anastasia Celina, born 16 May 1880, at 7 Upper Grove Street.  She died five months later on 30 October of acute bronchitis. 
Seven days later, on 7 November, Mary, their mother, died of tuberculosis.  She was only 35, and was buried in St Patricks Leytonstone.
Tuberculosis, also known as ‘consumption’, ‘phthisis’, or the ‘white plague’, was the cause of more deaths in industrialised countries than any other disease during the 19th and early 20th centuries.  By the late 19th century, 70 to 90% of the urban populations of Europe and North America were infected with the TB bacillus, and about 80% of those individuals who developed active tuberculosis died of it.
For most of the 19th century, tuberculosis was thought to be a hereditary, constitutional disease rather than a contagious one.  By the end of the 19th century, when infection rates in some cities were thought by public health officials to be nearly 100%, tuberculosis was also considered to be a sign of poverty or an inevitable outcome of the process of industrial civilisation.  About 40% of working-class deaths in cities were from tuberculosis.

The choice of first names for child 7 is interesting.  There was a popular French opera called Gwendoline in the 1880s and a cousin, Patrick , who came to Poplar, married an Anastasia. Celina was a derivation of the French Céline, so perhaps she was a character in the opera?  I wonder if it had been performed at the Queens Theatre in Poplar High Street and they liked the names.

My reason for showing all the addresses is to evidence how regularly our people moved house – this was the norm, but I am not sure if people moved by choice to improve their circumstances or were pushed.  Landlords were reputed to be predatory and a lot of sub-letting went on, but it will need more work to understand this better.
On the whole it seems Thomas and Mary moved steadily up in terms of the quality of their accommodation, so he must have maintained a regular income.  Moving north of the East India Dock Road was to achieve a better environment.
In 1851, Thomas and Ellen, Thomas’s parents, were living in 13 Orchard Place, St Marylebone as two of 42.  I have no idea how many floors there were in this building but the conditions must have been appalling
In 1861, Ellen and three children were living in 28 Mary Street (south of the East India Dock Road) as four amongst 11.  The description earlier does not suggest very good living conditions.
In 1871, Thomas, Mary and two children were living in 2 Charles Street (north of the East India Dock Road) as four of 11
In 1881, Thomas and three children were living in 18 New Street as five out of 10
In 1891, Thomas and three children were living in 4 Charles Street in two rooms as four people out of ten in the whole house.  The other family had four rooms.
In 1901, Thomas and two children are living in four rooms in 42 Railway Street.  The other family in the house had two rooms for five people.
By 1911, Thomas, Catherine and Margaret are in 21 Cotton Street with his son’s James’s family of seven.  All O’Donoghues together.
Poplar as a place to live
William J. Fishman’s East End 1888 says that Poplar, including Bow and Bromley was the most promising area to live.
Its amenities were considered good and well maintained i.e. disinfecting houses, public lamps, building and drainage, public lavatories.
And then there was the Poplar Baths opened in 1852, costing £10,000.  It was built to provide public wash facilities for the East End's poor.  The baths incorporated slipper (one end deeper than the other) and vapour (steam room) baths.  The slipper baths section contained 12 baths in the men's first-class division, 24 in the men's second-class and six in both women's divisions. Steam and shower baths were located behind the slipper baths. A comprehensive public laundry was located at the rear of the building, on Arthur Street.  It contained 48 wooden washing tubs, drying equipment and ironing rooms.  An uncovered water tank supplied the baths and was erected above the boiler house with a capacity of 24,000 gallons.
Poplar’s annual death rate was the lowest in the East End with an annual birth rate of 31.6 per 1000 living people and deaths 18.8.  Bethnal Green ran at 39.1 and 26.5.  Deaths from infectious diseases were the lowest at 2.6.
Poplar Hospital was highly regarded with a reputation for a caring service amongst the poor.
Poplar, as the largest district on the eastern border, housed the largest contingent of artisans (26%) compared to the others.  Bethnal Green was the highest in the ‘impoverished’ category.
Thomas’s employment
One imagines that he served some sort of apprenticeship and moved up through the skills.  This is what the records tell us:
At 17, in 1861 hammer man; 1865 caulker; 1866 iron riveter; 1867 caulker; 1869 boilermaker; 1872 caulker; 1874 boilermaker; 1881 iron shipbuilding riveter (see left & right); 1891 riveter in shipyard; 1901 riveter caulker; 1911 ship riveter in ship repair; 1920 boilermaker shipbuilders. 

I find this rather confusing.  I conclude he was a boilermaker who spent most of his time riveting, but could presumably carry out the full range of skills if required
On 1 July 1876, he joined the London 11 branch of the United Society of Boilermakers and Iron and Steel Shipbuilders founded in 1852. 

I have also found entries in the union’s Admittance Register for his son James and his two grandsons, Uncles James and Len.

Thomas worked for the Thames Ironworks and Shipbuilding and Engineering Company Ltd of Blackwall, where he rose to be a foreman. 

Created in 1857, this company was the largest shipbuilder on the Thames, its premises described by the Mechanics' Magazine in 1861 as ‘Leviathan Workshops’.  This 1867 map

shows the yard occupying a large triangular site in a right-angled bend on the east bank of Bow Creek with the railway to Thames Wharf on the third side, and with a smaller site on the west bank. The main yard had a quay 1,050 feet (320m) long.  To the south-east the yard occupied the north bank of the Thames east of Bow Creek, with two slips giving direct access to the main river.

Today the site is crossed by the A1020 Lower Lea Crossing and the Docklands Light Railway south of Canning Town station.

By 1863 the company had the capacity to build 25,000 tons of warships and 10,000 tons of mail steamers simultaneously.  One of its first Admiralty contracts was for HMS Warrior, launched in 1860, at the time the world's largest warship and the first iron-hulled armoured frigate.  HMS Minotaur followed in 1863, 400 feet (120 m) long and 10,690 tons displacement.

Crossrail archaeologists have recently uncovered evidence of this historic shipbuilding company that closed down a century ago.

The Thunderer

Uncle Len told me that Thomas worked on the Devastation-Class ironclad turret ship HMS Thunderer, 9330 tons, built for the Royal Navy in the 1870s.  She was refitted in 1881 at the Thames Ironworks and modernised in 1890-2.  This ship was taken out of service in 1907 and sold for scrap in 1909.

She was replaced by another Thunderer, a 22,500 ton battleship that took part in WWI.   She was the sixth ship of her name to serve in the Royal Navy and was laid down by the Thames Ironworks and Shipbuilding Company on 13 April 1910 and launched on 1 February 1911.  She was commissioned on 15 June 1912 at Devonport.  Thomas would have been 66 in 1910 so I don’t know if he would have worked on this one.

 The company also built sections of Sir Alexander Binnie's Blackwall Tunnel in 1895. The tunnel was more than 1300 metres (4410 feet) long and passed under the Thames to Greenwich. 

Industrial relations and the 1889 Dock Strike
Troubles started in 1888 with the journeymen bakers of Stepney walking out on 12 May and the match girls from Bryant & May on 5 July.  They changed the face of British Trade Unionism.
I don’t know whether Thomas was a union shop steward, but the Thames Ironworks suffered from industrial relations problems in the late 1880s and early 1890s.
The company’s approach to labour relations, through its managing director, Arnold Hills, was that of an enlightened patriarch.  He insisted on the right to employ non-union men which was deeply unpopular.
On 9 July 1889, the boilermakers in the Thames Ironworks went on strike, so Thomas would have been out.  The labourers joined the dispute in August and then the joiners walked out.  It was reported in the Thames Ironworks Gazette that ‘strike fever was in the air and West Ham took the infection badly.  The Thames Ironworks were the worst sufferers’.
In the docks (shipbuilding is not the docks) the dangerous nature of port work, combined with low pay, poor working conditions and widespread social deprivation ensured that the workforce looked to their trade unions for protection.  As a result, industrial relations were strained throughout the history of the port.
Until the late 19th century, much of the trade of the port was seasonal.  Sugar came from the West Indies, timber from the north, tea and spices from the Far East.  It was difficult to predict when ships would arrive since bad weather could delay a fleet.  On some days there were many ships in the docks, on others very few.
There was very little mechanisation - the loading and discharging of ships was highly labour-intensive.   Demand for men varied from day to day because there was very little advance notice that a ship was arriving.  The dock companies only took on labourers when trade picked up and they needed them.
Most workers in the docks were casual labourers taken on for the day.  Sometimes they would be taken on only for a few hours.  Twice a day there was a 'call-on' at each of the docks when labour was hired for short periods.

Only the lucky few would be selected, the rest would be sent home without payment.  The employers wanted to have a large number of men available for work but they did not want to pay them when there was no work.
Ben Tillett of the dockers' union described the 'call-on':
"We are driven into a shed, iron-barred from end to end, outside of which a foreman or contractor walks up and down with the air of a dealer in a cattle market, picking and choosing from a crowd of men, who, in their eagerness to obtain employment, trample each other underfoot, and where like beasts they fight for the chances of a day's work."

With such a fluctuating level of income the social conditions in which dockers’ families lived were very hard.
Unionisation only extended to about 5% of the national work force and it was only skilled workers who had union support.  As we have seen Thomas was in a union and did not work in the docks.
The dock strike started on August 14 and lasted five weeks with great suffering by the strikers’ families.  The strike committee was working from an office in Poplar.  Financial support poured in from as far away as Australia.

Marches took place from Poplar into the City and to Tower Hill.  Finally the employers gave in and all of the dockers’ demands were met.
Even after the dockers’ dispute was settled, unrest continued at the Thames Ironworks Blackwall complex.  The joiners downed tools again on 1 March 1890 and the engineers went on strike in August 1891.

This picture is of the shipbuilding foremen at the Blackwall works.  I wonder if Thomas is amongst them.

During this tense period, Hills was 'hissed' by his own workmen as he entered the yard.  The works gates were picketed and some of the replacement men were badly treated by strikers when they left the works.

After this period of conflict, Hills decided that important changes were needed to the company's labour relations practices.  In 1892 he put forward a 'Good Fellowship scheme' of bonuses on top of standard wage rates. Two years later a working day of eight hours rather than nine was introduced.

In 1895  the company formed the Thames Ironworks Football Club.  Originally based at Hermit Road, they played at the Memorial Ground from 1897 to 1904. In that year they moved to the Boleyn Ground in Green Street.

By that time they had become a professional side.  Since 1900, they have been known as West Ham Football Club after Hills had provided the money for a merger with another local side, Old Castle Swifts. 
After Mary’s death
Christmas 1880 must have been a miserable time for the family.  After Mary died, Catherine, at the age of 13, became mother to her younger siblings and Thomas’s housekeeper.
By 1891 son James at age 16 was employed as a riveter’s boy, I believe at the Thames Ironworks like his father.  He had already been to sea in the Merchant Navy.
Catherine is recorded as ‘looks after home’ in 1901 and Mary Ann was employed as a packer in a sweet factory.
In 1911 Catherine had become a washer woman and Margaret was a servant.  Both were single.

It is likely that Thomas retired when he was 70 as this was the pattern of the time, but it would have depended on the arrangements at Thames Ironworks.
He was a small man with twinkling blue eyes, sometimes with a small beard.  He was known to say "God bless your little heart and soul" when a child was in trouble.

He died on 23 March 1920, aged around 76, of bronchitis.  He was described as ‘Formerly boilermaker shipbuilders’.  Catherine was present at the death at 60 Cotton Street.  He was buried at St Patricks Leytonstone.
Each generation in a family contributes to its further development.  Thomas’s father was a skilled artisan.  Thomas maintained that tradition and provided a level of income to ensure ongoing improvement in their living conditions.  From the rural environment of Ballyduff (and the famine), he successfully brought his family through the industrial melting pot of the East End in the second half of the 19th century.
Acknowledgements & sources:,_Shipwrights,_Blacksmiths_and_Structural_Workers
Fishman, William J – East End 1888, Duckworth 1988